There is no such thing as a 'miracle' food or 'superfood' with unique properties; health benefits are linked to the overall consumption of whole plant-based foods rather than any specific product.

noli's read

The creator highlights the distinction between real nutrition and food marketing, a point widely supported by science. Nutritional epidemiology research, particularly through large cohort studies (such as the NutriNet-Santé study), confirms that it is the diversity and overall quality of the diet—rich in whole plants—that correlates with better health, rather than the isolated addition of a so-called 'super' food. The concept of a 'superfood' is indeed recognized by public health authorities as a marketing construct without a strict scientific definition. While certain compounds (antioxidants, flavonoids) have biological effects observed in laboratory or mechanistic studies, their actual effectiveness when ingested via a specific food is often exaggerated by the media. The creator rightly nuances that the benefits attributed to a specific fruit or vegetable actually apply to plants as a whole, validating a holistic approach to nutrition.

the sources

1. 1Stewart TM, Williamson DA, White MA 2002
2. 2Neumark-Sztainer D et al. 2007
3. 3McDonald D et al. (American Gut Project) 2018
4. 4Reynolds A et al. 2019