It is healthy and beneficial for the mind to allow oneself flexibility, to consume enjoyable foods, and to interrupt strict exercise or dietary routines during vacations. Conversely, imposing overly rigid restrictions harms psychological well-being and promotes cycles of deprivation followed by phases of compulsive consumption.

noli's read

Abbey Sharp's assertion aligns perfectly with decades of research in eating behavior psychology, which contrasts rigid control with flexible control of eating. Observational studies conducted by researcher Joachim Westenhoefer and colleagues consistently demonstrate that rigid restrictions predict greater psychological distress and overeating behaviors. In the laboratory, experimental work conducted by psychologists Janet Polivy and C. Peter Herman confirms the counter-regulation phenomenon (the 'what-the-hell' effect), where the breaking of a strict dietary rule triggers phases of compulsive consumption. Conversely, the adoption of flexible control—allowing oneself enjoyable foods without guilt—is associated in cohort studies with better weight regulation and a significant reduction in anxiety. Finally, allowing oneself periods of rest without imposing a strict training routine during vacations is widely supported by wellness expert opinions to prevent mental exhaustion and chronic stress. This advice is therefore based on robust scientific foundations, combining experimental and observational evidence.

the sources

1. 1Stewart TM, Williamson DA, White MA 2002
2. 2Neumark-Sztainer D et al. 2007