noli.

Register

The Diary Of A CEO - With Steven Bartlett

instagram/@thediaryofaceopodcast

not enough yet

Across 3 decoded pieces of advice. This scores the state of the evidence behind what they say — not them, and not their honesty. Good creators cover contested ground; that shows up here as mixed.

What Noli has graded

Doing calf raises (calf-muscle contractions while seated or standing) after a meal can meaningfully cut the glucose spike that follows — one of the easiest ways to move after eating, doable almost anywhere.

The full read

The claim is specific and testable, and it holds up well. A study published in iScience (Hamilton et al. 2022) found that sustained soleus (calf muscle) contractions, done while seated, cut the postprandial glucose spike by 52% and the insulin response by 60% compared to sitting still, an effect achieved by engaging barely 1% of body mass. This fits a broader post-meal-movement literature (short walks, stretching) that blunts the glucose rise, also captured in the corpus's post-meal-walk claim. The advantage of calf raises over walking is that they can be done seated, with no need for space or dedicated time, a genuinely practical point. The limit: the studies are small (a few dozen participants) and measure an acute effect on a single meal, not a demonstrated long-term health benefit, but the mechanism and the measurement are solid.

holds upFeb 28, 2026the post

Drinking water before coffee on waking makes sense, since you genuinely lose water overnight — but the idea that you then need to wait 90 minutes before your first caffeine to let the wake-up cortisol spike settle and dodge an afternoon crash has never been directly tested.

The full read

Overnight water loss through breathing and perspiration is real, and drinking a glass of water first thing is a reasonable, low-risk habit. The shakier part concerns cortisol: the wake-up cortisol spike is well documented, but no controlled trial has directly tested whether delaying caffeine by 90-120 minutes improves energy, mood, or sleep — that's a mechanistic inference, not a validated protocol. A recent sports-nutrition review points out that the argument actually runs backwards on adenosine's real kinetics: it rises within minutes of waking rather than continuing to decline, which undercuts the central logic of the 90-minute rule. Another important nuance: in regular coffee drinkers, the cortisol response to caffeine is markedly blunted, and can disappear entirely at high habitual intake — making the 'cortisol' worry largely moot for most daily drinkers. The rule's popularizer, neuroscientist Andrew Huberman, has himself walked back the recommendation from its original strict form. The caffeine lever actually backed by solid research isn't the morning clock — it's the evening cutoff: avoiding caffeine in the 8-9 hours before bed has a clear, measured effect on sleep, well beyond anything morning timing can deliver.

mixedFeb 24, 2026the post

Creatine isn't just for muscle — at doses higher than the standard 3-5g, some reaches the brain and may support cognitive energy, especially under stress or sleep loss.

The full read

Creatine's muscle benefit (3-5g/day) is well established; its brain role is real but more modest than the framing suggests. A 2024 meta-analysis of 16 RCTs (492 participants) found a small but significant effect on memory and processing speed, with no significant effect on overall cognitive function. Recent reviews converge on the same picture: the brain benefit shows up mainly when the brain is under metabolic stress (sleep deprivation, hypoxia, aging), not in a well-rested healthy adult. Stripped of its framing, the claim that creatine can support brain energy holds up — but at a modest, context-dependent level, not as a guaranteed everyday cognitive boost.

mixedFeb 11, 2026the post

The whole Register · What matters first