The creator asserts that many popular dietary restrictions (such as avoiding microwaves, cutting out bread, eating exclusively organic, or practicing intermittent fasting) are based on unfounded myths. According to them, none of these choices offer an inherent advantage for well-being or weight loss, as the latter depends solely on maintaining an overall energy deficit.

noli's read

Regarding microwave cooking, scientific research validates the creator's approach: according to experts at Harvard Medical School, this rapid cooking method often preserves water-soluble vitamins (such as vitamin C) better than traditional boiling methods. For intermittent fasting, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in the journal MDPI (2024) demonstrates that this practice provides no superior benefit for weight management or metabolic improvement compared to traditional continuous caloric restriction. Regarding organic food, a large meta-analysis by Smith-Spangler et al. (2012) concludes that differences in essential nutrient content between organic and conventional products are clinically negligible, despite lower exposure to pesticide residues in organic goods. Similarly, another meta-analysis published in the British Journal of Nutrition notes that although organic produce sometimes displays slightly higher levels of antioxidants, the actual impact of these variations on general well-being is not firmly established. Finally, on the subject of bread and body composition, the nutritional consensus confirms that carbohydrate consumption does not promote fat gain as long as the overall energy balance remains stable.

the sources

1. 1Cioffi I, Evangelista A, Ponzo V, et al. 2018
2. 2Lowe DA, Wu N, Rohdin-Bibby L, et al. 2020
3. 3Liu D, Huang Y, Huang C, et al. 2022
4. 4Jamshed H, Steger FL, Bryan DR, et al. 2022
5. 5Jiménez-Monreal AM, García-Diz L, Martínez-Tomé M, Mariscal M, Murcia MA 2009
6. 6Rickman JC, Barrett DM, Bruhn CM 2007
7. 7Smith-Spangler C et al. 2012
8. 8Baranski M et al. 2014