noli.

Register

David Sinclair@davidasinclairX

NEW STUDY: It's dogma that fasting is good for you because it increases autophagy, the recycling of cell parts. But in the largest study

what it claims

Intermittent fasting (TRE) and calorie restriction (CR) do not appear to increase autophagy in humans, contrary to what current dogma suggests.

mixed

This claim is based on a recent study published in Nature Communications (2024), which followed participants for six months.

noli's read

This claim is based on a recent study published in Nature Communications (2024), which followed participants for six months. The study shows an actual absence of any significant increase in autophagy markers measured in the blood, calling into question the idea that fasting acts primarily via this mechanism in humans over the long term. It is important to note that autophagy is a complex process that is difficult to measure accurately in vivo in humans, and that these results contrast with many observational studies or those conducted on animal models. The researcher does not say that fasting is useless, but emphasizes that the biological mechanism often highlighted is not supported by these new, robust data. What stands here is the questioning of the specific mechanism of action. What is potentially exaggerated is concluding that the practice is totally ineffective, as other metabolic benefits (insulin, weight) remain documented in the scientific literature.

the sources

  1. 1Cioffi I, Evangelista A, Ponzo V, et al. 2018
  2. 2Lowe DA, Wu N, Rohdin-Bibby L, et al. 2020
  3. 3Liu D, Huang Y, Huang C, et al. 2022
  4. 4Jamshed H, Steger FL, Bryan DR, et al. 2022
  5. 5Kraus WE, Bhapkar M, Huffman KM, et al. 2019
  6. 6Barzilai N, Crandall JP, Kritchevsky SB, Espeland MA 2016
  7. 7Martin-Montalvo A, Mercken EM, Mitchell SJ, et al. 2013
  8. 8Harrison DE, Strong R, Alavez S, et al. 2019

Claimed by David Sinclair. Noli grades the claim, never the person.

Decoded by Noli · July 18, 2026 · the original post

What the graded evidence says

Evidence
B
Effect
body-weight change vs continuous energy restriction — no meaningful difference: weighted mean difference -0.61 kg (95% CI -1.70 to 0.47), non-significant; TRE added to calorie counting gives no extra loss beyond the calorie deficit
Measured on
adults with overweight or obesity

What’s uncertain

Fasting has no special fat-loss power beyond the calorie deficit it helps create. If it makes you overeat later or feel miserable, a simpler steady approach works just as well.

David Sinclair in the Register32 claims graded · solidity 63/100See their record →

More from David Sinclair

Others on this

Noli has read similar claims

Other advice in the Register that leans on the same research.

Noli, a firefly holding its lantern, at rest

Seen something like this? Send it to Noli.

Paste any health post from TikTok, Instagram, YouTube or X — or the advice itself, if someone just told you. About ten seconds, no account needed.