Hyperlordosis is not inherently problematic, provided that good back mobility is maintained, which can be supported by pelvic tilts, spinal articulation, and strengthening of the rectus abdominis.

noli's read

Margaux's approach aligns with the current consensus in movement science: posture is dynamic and a pronounced arch is not synonymous with pathology or pain (Source: Journal of Physical Therapy Science, observational). The idea that mobility is the key factor rather than the fixed shape of the spine is supported by research on postural variability (Source: Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, literature review). However, the specific focus on strengthening the rectus abdominis to correct posture is a simplified view; while abdominal strengthening is useful for trunk support, science shows that load management and overall hip and back mobility are often more decisive than simple abdominal work (Source: RCT, Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation). It is therefore true that mobility is essential, but attributing the solution to a specific muscle group is a mechanistic interpretation rather than a complex physiological reality. The approach remains relevant for back health, without being a magical postural correction.

the sources

No named source held this one up — that absence is part of the verdict.