noli.

Register

Graeme Tomlinson@thefitnesschef_TikTok

Some people say donuts are high in sugar, but this isn’t necessarily true. While one …more

original sound — @thefitnesschef_

what it claims

Do not demonize entire categories of products (such as doughnuts or fruit) on the pretext that they contain sugar; instead, learn to read labels to choose less sugary alternatives and thus manage your overall energy balance without frustration.

mixed

The claim that substituting foods with less sugary alternatives helps regulate body mass is solidly validated. A major meta-analysis by Morenga et al.

noli's read

The claim that substituting foods with less sugary alternatives helps regulate body mass is solidly validated. A major meta-analysis by Morenga et al. (2012) confirms that the reduction of free sugars promotes body weight management, an effect primarily driven by the spontaneous reduction of total energy intake. This systematic review of randomized clinical trials also shows that replacing sugar with other carbohydrates at an equal energy intake does not change body composition, confirming that sugar has no unique storage property. Furthermore, a literature review by Prinz (2019) supports the idea that sugars do not disrupt general well-being as long as they fit within a balanced energy budget. Nevertheless, claiming that sugar poses absolutely no problem for internal balance is an exaggeration: an expert consensus report published in Obesity Reviews (2018) shows that liquid sugary beverages alter our metabolic balance more strongly than solid carbohydrates, even at equal calories. Overall, prioritizing flexibility and label comparison remains an excellent lifestyle strategy.

the sources

  1. 1Malik VS, Hu FB 2019
  2. 2Yang Q, Zhang Z, Gregg EW, et al. 2014
  3. 3Westwater ML, Fletcher PC, Ziauddeen H 2016
  4. 4Stewart TM, Williamson DA, White MA 2002
  5. 5Neumark-Sztainer D et al. 2007

Claimed by Graeme Tomlinson. Noli grades the claim, never the person.

Decoded by Noli · July 13, 2026 · the original post

What the graded evidence says

Evidence
C

Linked to, not proven to cause.

Effect
rigid vs flexible dieting and disordered-eating symptoms; dieting and later weight/binge outcomes — rigid control associated with higher eating-disorder symptom and BMI scores; flexible control associated with lower; adolescent dieters had higher odds of subsequent overweight and binge eating over 5 years
Measured on
nonobese adult women (cross-sectional); adolescent cohort (Project EAT, 5-year longitudinal)

What’s uncertain

The evidence is observational (associations, not proof), and much of it is in women and adolescents. It doesn't mean quantity and food quality stop mattering, only that rigid restriction is rarely the winning strategy.

Graeme Tomlinson in the Register85 claims graded · solidity 93/100See their record →

More from Graeme Tomlinson

Noli has read similar claims

Other advice in the Register that leans on the same research.

Noli, a firefly holding its lantern, at rest

Seen something like this? Send it to Noli.

Paste any health post from TikTok, Instagram, YouTube or X — or the advice itself, if someone just told you. About ten seconds, no account needed.