noli.

Register

Santa Cruz Paleo

tiktok/@santacruzmedicinals

not enough yet

Across 1 decoded pieces of advice. This scores the state of the evidence behind what they say — not them, and not their honesty. Good creators cover contested ground; that shows up here as mixed.

What Noli has graded

Cutting back on the classic ultra-processed staples (soda, packaged chips, sugary cereal) remains one of the better-supported dietary levers — just without the drama: the long-term risk association is real and reproduced, not an immediate sentence for one indulgence now and then.

The full read

Stripped of the alarmist tone ("no no no," the pleading emoji), the claim — that the foods named raise long-term health risk — is backed by several large cohorts (NutriNet-Santé, UK Biobank, US cohorts) that link a higher share of ultra-processed food in the diet to higher long-term risk, with modest but consistent effect sizes (roughly +10-20% per 10-point rise in UPF share) across countries and populations. This is observational data: it can't say a specific soda or box of sugary cereal "causes" something in any one person. The most rigorous controlled trial to date (Hall 2019) mainly shows these foods push people to eat about 500 extra kcal a day — that overeating mechanism, more than any single additive, is what most solidly explains the link to weight and metabolic health.

mixedMar 28, 2026the post

The whole Register · What matters first