noli.

Register

Running Addict@runningaddictTikTok

Ok c’est contre intuitif de se dire qu’un effort ultra facile va nous faire progresser …more

original sound — @runningaddict

what it claims

To make lasting progress in running and avoid injuries, you should run the majority of your sessions at a slow and comfortable pace (base endurance), which can be simply measured by the ability to hold a conversation without getting out of breath.

holds up

The idea that running slowly improves overall performance is based on very solid physical principles.

noli's read

The idea that running slowly improves overall performance is based on very solid physical principles. The work of researcher Stephen Seiler (via observational analyses of athletes) has popularized polarized training, demonstrating that spending 80% of one's time at low intensity optimizes the body's energy efficiency. Furthermore, a randomized controlled trial by Muñoz et al. (2014) confirms that this low-intensity distribution outperforms consistently intensive training in recreational runners. Regarding injury prevention, the IOC scientific consensus (Soligard et al., 2016) maintains that a sudden increase in workload and intensity is the primary cause of overuse injuries. Finally, the use of the "talk test" suggested by the creator is scientifically validated by the study by Foster et al. (2008) as a reliable benchmark for staying in the correct effort zone without equipment.

the sources

  1. 1Rosenblat MA, Perrotta AS, Vicenzino B 2019
  2. 2Silva Oliveira P, Boppre G, Fonseca H 2024
  3. 3Menshikova EV, Ritov VB, Ferrell RE, et al. 2007

Claimed by Running Addict. Noli grades the claim, never the person.

Decoded by Noli · July 14, 2026 · the original post

What the graded evidence says

Evidence
C
Effect
endurance performance (VO2max, time trial) polarized vs threshold intensity distribution — polarized modestly favored in a small meta-analysis (only 3-4 RCTs); a larger 2024 review found no clear superiority over other distributions
Measured on
trained endurance athletes (>2 years experience); mechanistic mitochondrial data in adults

What’s uncertain

The head-to-head evidence for a specific intensity split is limited to a handful of small trials with mixed results, so precise prescriptions like exact Zone 2 percentages shouldn't be treated as settled science.

Running Addict in the Register102 claims graded · solidity 95/100See their record →

More from Running Addict

Others on this

Noli has read similar claims

Other advice in the Register that leans on the same research.

Noli, a firefly holding its lantern, at rest

Seen something like this? Send it to Noli.

Paste any health post from TikTok, Instagram, YouTube or X — or the advice itself, if someone just told you. About ten seconds, no account needed.