The main idea under debate is that it would be possible and desirable to neutralize or transcend one’s negative emotions to reach a more serene mental state, an approach that many consider simplistic or even counterproductive.

noli's read

The community is deeply divided, with strong resistance to the idea that so-called negative emotions must be suppressed. Psychological science, notably through research on emotional acceptance (Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, RCTs), suggests that seeking to suppress or avoid emotions can paradoxically increase their intensity, a phenomenon known as the rebound effect. Emotions, even uncomfortable ones, are considered by evolutionary psychology (observational studies) to be essential adaptive signals for guiding our behaviors and regulating our social interactions. The idea that these emotions are inherently bad and should be 'leveled out' or suppressed lacks scientific foundation and ignores their functional role in our psychic balance. Conversely, learning to observe these emotions without identifying with them, as suggested by certain meditative practices validated by meta-analyses, seems to be a more robust path for emotional regulation. The thread's argument regarding the link between emotional suppression and extreme behaviors is a personal interpretation not supported by rigorous clinical evidence.

the sources

1. 1r/Meditation