The complexity or pronunciability of a chemical ingredient's name does not determine its danger; everything is chemical, and only the nature of the substance and its actual dose matter.

noli's read

This advice is based on a fundamental principle of toxicology: 'the dose makes the poison,' a concept established by Paracelsus and widely validated by modern research (Basic Principle in Toxicology, international scientific consensus). The idea that the scientific name (IUPAC) is neutral is factually accurate; it is a descriptive nomenclature system and not a risk indicator. Cognitive psychology studies, such as those exploring the 'naturalness bias,' confirm that consumers tend to judge 'chemical' or complex ingredients as more harmful without factual evidence (Journal of Food Science). The confusion between 'complex name' and 'danger' is a common fallacy in wellness communication. Science confirms that many natural compounds (like the cited vitamin C) possess complex names, while highly toxic substances can have short and simple names. The assertion is therefore solid, as it underscores that real identity and concentration are the only relevant parameters for evaluating safety.

the sources

No named source held this one up — that absence is part of the verdict.