The chemical properties of a compound (such as table salt) are radically different from those of the elements that compose it (such as metallic sodium), a logic that must apply to all chemical compounds, including those present in vaccines.

noli's read

The advice is based on a fundamental principle of chemistry: the properties of a molecule depend on its atomic bonds and not on the simple addition of its elemental components. The distinction between metallic sodium (highly reactive) and the sodium ion present in table salt is an indisputable chemical fact validated by scientific literature (general chemistry textbooks, IUPAC). Applying this reasoning to ethylmercury or the aluminum salts used in vaccines is scientifically consistent, as these compounds possess different bioavailability and toxicity than the pure elements (evaluations by the WHO and the CDC, pharmacokinetic studies). To say that a compound 'is' its constituent element is a failure of chemical understanding, and the analogy used is pedagogically sound. Nothing in this post is exaggerated; it is a factual explanation aimed at correcting a common confusion regarding the intrinsic danger of molecules. There is no scientific debate regarding this basic law of matter.

the sources

No named source held this one up — that absence is part of the verdict.