noli.

Register

Graeme Tomlinson@thefitnesschef_Instagram

Here are 5 foods marketed as high protein that aren’t high in protein at all 🙂.⁣⁣ ⁣⁣⁣- It is ironic that

… more

what it claims

Systematically check the nutrition label (grams of protein per serving) of foods marketed as "high in protein," as they are often more expensive and sometimes contain less protein than simple staple foods (milk, cheese, bread, peanuts).

mixed

The recommendation to read labels is entirely sound for overcoming perception biases.

noli's read

The recommendation to read labels is entirely sound for overcoming perception biases. An observational study from the MAPP Centre at Aarhus University (2018) confirms that consumers struggle to differentiate between naturally protein-rich foods and those artificially fortified, making them particularly receptive to marketing claims. On a regulatory level, European Regulation EC No 1924/2006 (legal framework) stipulates that a "high protein" claim simply requires 20% of the product's total energy to come from protein, which explains why low absolute portions (such as 7 to 10g of protein for a low-calorie product) can legally bear it. Nevertheless, the creator's assertion that a "proper" serving must reach 20g remains arbitrary, as there is no fixed wellness threshold for an isolated snack. Furthermore, the comparison with staple foods like bread or peanuts should be nuanced, as these come with a much higher caloric or lipid intake that may not align with everyone's goals. Finally, labeling these options as "scams" overlooks the convenience they offer to active individuals seeking to supplement their daily intake on the go.

the sources

  1. 1Chandon P, Wansink B 2007
  2. 2Croker H, Packer J, Russell SJ, Stansfield C, Viner RM 2020

Claimed by Graeme Tomlinson. Noli grades the claim, never the person.

Decoded by Noli · July 13, 2026 · the original post

What the graded evidence says

Effect
biased calorie perception (halo) and objective purchasing shifts (interpretive labels) — health-claim framing lowered calorie estimates and raised intentions to add sides in consumer experiments; interpretive front-of-pack labels modestly reduced sugar (~-0.4 to -0.67 g/100g) and sodium content of purchases in meta-analysis
Measured on
general adult consumers

What’s uncertain

The halo effect is well documented in short consumer experiments; how much it changes real long-term eating is less certain. Front-of-pack labels help on average but the effects are modest.

Graeme Tomlinson in the Register85 claims graded · solidity 93/100See their record →

More from Graeme Tomlinson

Others on this

Noli has read similar claims

Other advice in the Register that leans on the same research.

Noli, a firefly holding its lantern, at rest

Seen something like this? Send it to Noli.

Paste any health post from TikTok, Instagram, YouTube or X — or the advice itself, if someone just told you. About ten seconds, no account needed.