No food is inherently good or bad: you should rely on actual nutritional facts (calories, sugar, fiber) rather than marketing or the demonization of certain products, because the balance of your overall diet matters much more than isolated foods.

noli's read

The creator proposes a pragmatic and guilt-free approach to nutrition by comparing labels to show that products perceived as "healthy" are not systematically more advantageous than options usually demonized. Factually, composition databases (such as the USDA FoodData Central) validate the accuracy of his macronutrient, sugar, and fiber comparisons. Regarding omega-3s, the Office of Dietary Supplements (NIH) syntheses (expert opinion) confirm that mackerel is a highly bioavailable source of essential fatty acids and is superior to many basic supplements. However, the figure of "25 times more EPA" is exaggerated: a standard 1000 mg fish oil capsule generally contains about 180 mg of EPA, making 100 g of mackerel (containing about 1 g of EPA) only 5 to 6 times more concentrated. Finally, the claim that these supplements are filled with "non-beneficial oils" lacks foundation, as the EFSA (expert opinion) specifies that these are simply other natural fats derived from the fish that have not been isolated, rather than harmful added ingredients. His message of avoiding binary food categorization remains, however, excellent for cultivating healthy dietary well-being.

the sources

1. 1Stewart TM, Williamson DA, White MA 2002
2. 2Neumark-Sztainer D et al. 2007
3. 3Chandon P, Wansink B 2007
4. 4Croker H, Packer J, Russell SJ, Stansfield C, Viner RM 2020