Hunger should not be feared or pathologized; it is an essential biological signal that simply indicates the body needs energy, regardless of the type of food consumed.

noli's read

This advice aligns with the current scientific consensus regarding the homeostatic regulation of appetite. Research, notably through meta-analyses on intuitive eating (e.g., Tylka & Wood-Barcalow, 2015), confirms that recognizing internal hunger and satiety cues is correlated with better metabolic and psychological health. Abbey Sharp correctly points out that the sensation of hunger is regulated by hormones such as ghrelin and leptin, and that responding to this need is a normal physiological process rather than a failure of willpower. The argument that limiting the response to hunger to 'low-calorie' foods (such as celery or fruit) can perpetuate cognitive restriction is supported by studies in nutritional psychology. It is scientifically consistent to note that meals low in protein, fat, and fiber do not provide lasting satiety, which may amplify the sensation of hunger. There is no evidence to suggest that hunger is only 'valid' when satisfied by specific foods, which reinforces the relevance of her approach against the demonization of certain foods.

the sources

No named source held this one up — that absence is part of the verdict.