noli.

Register

Andrew Huberman, Ph.D.@hubermanlabInstagram

SHORT & LONG WAVELENGTH LIGHT EXPOSURE WITH SUN & INCANDESCENT LIGHTS FOR YOUR HEALTH • Recently, I appeared

… more

what it claims

Exposing yourself to long-wavelength light (red/infrared), via late afternoon sunlight or incandescent bulbs, is beneficial for mitochondrial function and overall health.

mixed

Research, notably through preclinical studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on photobiomodulation, suggests that certain red and near-infrared wavelengths can promote…

noli's read

Research, notably through preclinical studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on photobiomodulation, suggests that certain red and near-infrared wavelengths can promote cellular energy production by interacting with mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase. The idea that natural light at the end of the day is beneficial for the circadian rhythm is well established (meta-analyses on circadian health). However, the claim that domestic incandescent bulbs are sufficient to reproduce these therapeutic mitochondrial benefits is extrapolated and lacks direct clinical evidence in humans. While these bulbs do indeed emit a portion of their spectrum in the red/infrared range, the intensity is generally far too low to induce the biological effects observed in targeted therapy. Furthermore, although LED light is sometimes criticized for its blue spectrum, the idea that it specifically harms mitochondrial function at domestic exposure levels remains a research hypothesis requiring more robust evidence. The advice is therefore an interesting interpretation of real biological mechanisms, applied to a domestic context not validated by clinical trials.

the sources

  1. 1Wunsch A, Matuschka K 2014

Claimed by Andrew Huberman, Ph.D. Noli grades the claim, never the person.

Decoded by Noli · July 18, 2026 · the original post

What the graded evidence says

Evidence
C
Effect
skin appearance and intradermal collagen density — Controlled trial (n=113): red/near-infrared light significantly improved skin complexion and feeling, reduced fine lines, wrinkles and roughness, and increased ultrasonographically measured collagen density vs untreated controls. No comparable human evidence for systemic 'mitochondrial recharge' or whole-body energy.
Measured on
adults seeking skin rejuvenation (single controlled trial); systemic claims unstudied

What’s uncertain

The skin benefits come from limited trials and device output varies, so keep expectations modest. The systemic 'mitochondrial energy' story is mechanistic hype without strong human evidence — Noli reframes it as skincare, not a metabolic upgrade.

Andrew Huberman, Ph.D. in the Register144 claims graded · solidity 82/100See their record →

More from Andrew Huberman, Ph.D.

Noli has read similar claims

Other advice in the Register that leans on the same research.

Noli, a firefly holding its lantern, at rest

Seen something like this? Send it to Noli.

Paste any health post from TikTok, Instagram, YouTube or X — or the advice itself, if someone just told you. About ten seconds, no account needed.